The Bitcoin price remains volatile – the bears can still defend the $ 20,000 mark. The most important BTC price targets and the status quo of Bitcoin dominance.

The Bitcoin price has barely changed in a weekly comparison and has continued to trade above 19,000 US dollars since the last price analysis

The battle between bulls and bears starts a new round just below the all-time high. The first attempt to reach the old all-time high was repulsed by the bears on November 25th. As a result, the Bitcoin price fell significantly by $ 3,200. As already mentioned in the last analysis, there was another bullish counterattack only in the support area at 16,267 US dollars.

From here, the bulls launched a new attack attempt and bought Ethereum Code scam again high towards the 2017 all-time high of $ 19,885. This price mark was surpassed for a short time yesterday, Tuesday, December 1st, and a new all-time high was established at 19,915 US dollars. A short time later, a lack of follow-up purchases and a bearish counterattack led to another sale of the key currency back to 18,089 US dollars.

The bears could not develop the same selling pressure again as in the previous week. For the time being, a higher high and higher low is forming above the EMA20 (red). However, bearish divergences are again evident in the RSI and MACD indicators. Today, Wednesday morning, the current daily candle moved within the range of the previous day at currently 19,119 US dollars, which is to be assessed as neutral.

Bullish scenario (Bitcoin price)

Investors‘ buying interest can still be described as strong. Although the volume has been decreasing in the last few days, as long as the BTC rate can stay above the EMA20 at the daily closing rate, there are definitely further chances of a breakout above the all-time high. If the bulls manage to move the reserve currency dynamically above 19,915 US dollars and let it rise to 20,089 US dollars, the chances of a sustainable breakout improve noticeably. If this resistance area is overrun with high volume at the daily closing price, a march through to the 200 Fibonacci extension at $ 21,113 should be planned. If this resistance is overcome dynamically, a follow-up movement of up to 23,887 US dollars is also conceivable. The maximum price target is initially the resistance at 26. 664 US dollars (261 Fibonacci retracment). If the BTC price does not turn significantly downwards at this resistance either, a price target in the area of ​​35,074 US dollars cannot be ruled out for 2021.

NANO price follows a long term descending resistance line.

Resistances are found at $ 1.45 and $ 2.05, and support is at $ 0.96.

The technical indicators for the day are bullish

Nano (NANO) price broke a long term resistance line on November 24th. It was rejected soon after and has been in decline ever since.

Despite its steep fall, price has already found support and is expected to show an upper low soon before starting to move up towards the resistances highlighted in this analysis.

Passage of long-term resistance

The course NANO followed a descending resistance line since May 2019, that until recently. On November 21, the price began to move higher and broke that line three days later, peaking at $ 1.51.

That said, the price was rejected by the resistance at $ 1.45. A long upper strand appeared and price moved back below the descending resistance line. It is possible that the NANO will now follow an ascending support line (dotted). Therefore, the latter should create a symmetrical triangle figure. However, the row has not been sufficiently validated.

Technical indicators are ambiguous, and fail to give a clear indication of the trend. MACD and RSI are higher, while the Stochastic Oscillator has created a bearish cross.

If price breaks its resistance, the next would be at $ 2.05, which is the top of the descending resistance line and the 0.5 fibonacci retracement level of the last decline.

Crypto trader @GolrishBeck tweeted a NANO chart, which shows the price has broken a long-term descending resistance line. It did at the start of the week, but the decline that began on November 26 threw doubts about that breakthrough by creating the aforementioned long top wick.

Los investigadores estiman que una investigación en curso de la „oficina de seguridad pública“ ha dejado 2.300 millones de dólares de Bitcoin (BTC) en la bolsa de criptografía de Malta OKEx en el limbo.

Los retiros de dinero en la bolsa permanecen congelados y los detalles oficiales sobre lo que está sucediendo son escasos. El grupo de medios chinos Caixin informa que el fundador de OKEx, Xu Mingxing, fue secuestrado por la policía hace al menos una semana. Dos fuentes anónimas „cercanas a OKEx“ le dicen a Caixin que Mingxing es la persona en cuestión. Según una de las fuentes, la desaparición de Mingxing afecta a la retirada de los activos criptográficos de la bolsa.

OKEx ha emitido un comunicado de prensa sobre el asunto pero la declaración es ligera en cuanto a los detalles.

„Uno de nuestros poseedores de claves privadas está actualmente cooperando con una oficina de seguridad pública en investigaciones donde se requiera. Hemos estado fuera de contacto con el titular de la clave privada en cuestión. Por lo tanto, no se ha podido completar la autorización correspondiente.

De acuerdo con 8.1 Cambio de servicio e interrupción de los términos de servicio, OKEx puede cambiar el servicio y/o también puede interrumpir, suspender o terminar el servicio en cualquier momento con o sin previo aviso. Con el fin de actuar en el mejor interés de los clientes y ofrecer un servicio excepcional a largo plazo, hemos decidido suspender los retiros de activos digitales/codigos a partir del [16 de octubre de 2020 a las 11:00 (hora de Hong Kong)]“.

OKEx asegura a los clientes que sus activos permanecen seguros y que las „otras funciones del intercambio permanecen normales y estables“. El CEO de la bolsa, Jay Hao, reitera que la investigación no involucra a OKEx, ya que se centra sólo en la cuestión personal del poseedor de la clave privada.

La plataforma de análisis en cadena Glassnode revela que OKEx posee cientos de miles de BTC con un valor de más de 2.000 millones de dólares.

„De acuerdo con nuestros datos, alrededor de 200.000 BTC (1,1% del suministro de Bitcoin en circulación) están actualmente guardados en las carteras de OKEx. Eso es alrededor de 2.300 millones de dólares de BTC almacenados en las bóvedas de la bolsa.“

Bitcoin (BTC) over $12,200

In 2020, the CTO had managed to break the $12,200 threshold only once, and briefly, during the summer. Then its price suffered a sharp correction in early September. The question is whether this increase signals a new bull run, or whether Bitcoin Machine price will fall again.

The rise had started in mid-October, but the biggest breakthrough came early this morning, with the price of Bitcoin rising by almost 4% in a few hours:

Bitcoin BTC price

Over the last two weeks, the BTC course has increased by 14%, finally surpassing the levels of September 1st. Its market cap is approaching $227 billion.

However, the breakthrough of the greatest cryptomony does not seem for the moment to have led to the altcoins. Over the last 24 hours, Ether (ETH) has only increased by +1%, and Ripple’s XRP has stagnated at +0.1%. Same story for Bitcoin Cash (BCH), with +1%, while the Binance Coin (BNB) falls by -1%, and the Chainlink (LINK) loses -2.6%.

There are several reasons for this difference between Bitcoin and Altcoins. Some commentators believe that the funds that fueled the DeFi madness over the summer are being redirected to the BTC :

„The money is moving from the Altcoins to the BTC. …] This will give the BTC a decent short-term movement, probably around $14,000-15,000. At the same time, the DeFi coins are oversold, which creates interesting entry points for people who are positioning themselves for the long term. »

Others mention the fall of the dollar, which makes investors turn to valuable reserves such as gold… And boosts Bitcoin in the process, which is generally considered more of a financial haven than its Altcoin comrades.

An increase in Altcoin, and Ether in particular, would confirm a basic trend for Bitcoin. We should therefore wait and see whether this is a technical bull trap, or a real bull run.

Keizer’s controversial comments continue to look at global currencies.

Using the analogy of a Hi/Lo poker game – a variety of poker that crowns the highest and lowest hands as victorious – speaker Max Keizer explained that citizens will end up losing when it comes to keeping government issued coins.

„Unless you are a country that can make money by devaluing its currency by receiving kickbacks from Wall Street, which packs all these currencies in the form of negative interest rate bonds, then you only have one choice,“ Keizer said during an October 15 episode of his program, Keizer Report, adding:

„You can only try to win the high hand: gold, silver and Bitcoin. You can’t win by playing the low hand unless you are a sovereign state or a major investment bank, and that is the game today.“

At the end of a complicated year that included the US issuing significant amounts of money, economic difficulties and concerns about the global pandemic, several commentators continue to promote a narrative that Wealth Matrix financial assets over money.

„The foreign exchange market, the paper money traffickers, the sovereign currencies – all are trying to quote ‚fuel inflation‘, but we know this is false,“ Keizer explained. „They are trying to devalue their currency to boost exports at the expense of everyone at the poker table, the geopolitical game. […] The question is – who will have the worst currency in the future?“

Only governments and banks can win the low hand option, according to Keizer. Small players have another route, however – to win the high hand for owning gold, silver and Bitcoin (BTC). People often look to this asset trio for protection against inflation and as protection against other economic conditions.

New York Department of Financial Services fant at kryptofirmaer blokkerte Twitter-hackernes krypto-adresser innen 40 minutter.

New York Department of Financial Services, eller NYDFS, har gitt ut en lang rapport som analyserer virkningen av Julys høyprofilerte Twitter-hack , noe som resulterte i tyveri av over $ 118.000 i Bitcoin ( BTC )

Langt utover den umiddelbare materielle innvirkningen, opplyser NYDFS at hendelsen avslørte dype cybersikkerhetssvakheter hos et børsnotert sosialt medieselskap verdsatt til $ 37 milliarder dollar og teller over 330 millioner aktive månedlige brukere. Oppdagelsen har alvorlige konsekvenser i lys av plattformens stadig voksende innflytelse på både finansmarkedene og den politiske sfæren.

To viktige deler av NYFDS- rapporten , publisert 14. oktober, takler Twitter-hackets innvirkning på avdelingens kryptovaluta-lisensinnehavere, og hvordan disse selskapene reagerte for å beskytte sine klienter mot svindel. Bitcoin Era undersøkte og samlet kryptofirmaers anbefalinger om hvordan man kan forhindre at en lignende nettangrep lykkes i fremtiden.

Byrået bemerker at i den tredje fasen av hacket tok angriperne sikte på Twitter-kontoene til kryptoselskaper, som inkluderte NYDFS-regulerte enheter. Disse “svarte raskt for å blokkere adresser som var berørt, og demonstrerte modenheten til New Yorks kryptokurrencymarked og de som var autorisert til å engasjere seg i den. Deres handlinger viser at New York fortsetter å sette høy standard og kun tiltrekke seg de mest ansvarlige aktørene. ”

Coinbase, Gemini og Square, som alle tilbyr lommeboktjenester og hvis Twitter-kontoer ble hacket, blokkerte raskt Bitcoin-adressene som ble lagt ut av hackerne på Twitter

I følge NYFDS ‚undersøkelse blokkerte hvert av selskapene de aktuelle adressene innen 40 minutter etter at kontoene ble hacket.

Femten undersøkte kryptofirmaer blokkerte totalt overføringer til adressene, mens syv ikke gjorde det. Rapporten bemerker at noen selskaper har forskjellige forretningsmodeller og ikke håndterer forvaring og overføringstjenester direkte, noe som står for deres passivitet.

Blant de som gjør det, blokkerte Coinbase rundt 5670 overføringer, til en verdi av omtrent $ 1 294 000; Square blokkert 358, verdsatt til omtrent $ 51.000; Tvillingene blokkerte to, til en verdi av omtrent $ 18000; og Bitstamp blokkerte en, til en verdi av $ 250.

Det andre fokuset i NYFDS-undersøkelsen og rapporten var å analysere hvilke sikkerhetstiltak kryptofirmaene tok for å beskytte sine sosiale mediekontoer etter hacket, og samle viktige anbefalinger for å sementere sikkerheten fremover.

Disse inkluderte bruk av sterke og unike passord, overvåking av sosiale mediekontoer for uautoriserte innlegg, bruk av flerfaktorautentisering, men unngå SMS-basert MFA på grunn av sin følsomhet for hack, og begrense ansattes tilgang til sosiale mediekontoer.

Il progetto dedicato all’interoperabilità tra le catene e al credit scoring on chain vuole promuovere l’ecosistema dei prestiti DeFi.

Il progetto DeFi non basato su Ethereum ha già bloccato 180 milioni di dollariNOTICIAS

Wing, un protocollo di prestito creato in Blockchain Ontology, ha attualmente 180 milioni di dollari in asset crittografici impegnati nella sua piattaforma – una piccola somma, anche per gli standard dell’Ethereum (ETH).

Eric Pinos, leader dell’ecosistema di Ontology per le Americhe e consulente di Wing, ha dichiarato Bitcoin Rush al Cointelegraph che secondo lui due caratteristiche rendono unico questo progetto DeFi: l’interoperabilità tra le catene con l’Ethereum e il fatto che i prestiti sono basati sul credito, consentendo la sub-collateralizzazione dei prestiti. Il sistema OScore analizza il comportamento di ogni utente nella catena per generare un punteggio di credito. Questo determina la quantità di garanzie collaterali che l’utente deve impegnare per un determinato prestito:

„Quindi, invece di avere tutto a disposizione, dovete mettere 10.000 dollari se volete prendere in prestito 8.000 dollari con prestiti subcollaterali, potete mostrare un punteggio di credito che è costruito dalla vostra storia di transazioni a catena e dalla vostra storia di interazione con il DeFi. ”

Pins ha detto che questa funzione non è ancora stata rilasciata, anche se ha notato che sarà integrata nella prossima piscina.

A differenza della vecchia storia del credito al di fuori della rete, dove l’agenzia di rating di solito ha accesso alla maggior parte, se non a tutte, le informazioni rilevanti, la controparte della rete non lo fa, in quanto l’utente può scegliere quali indirizzi o conti inviare e quali omettere. Pinos ha detto che cercherà di mitigare queste sfide combinando i dati all’interno e all’esterno della rete, come i profili dei social media.

Pinos spera che le caratteristiche uniche di Wing attirino un numero maggiore di utenti e di risorse. Ha detto che stanno superando l’interoperabilità della catena incrociata DeFi, mentre l’alto costo delle transazioni all’Ethereum può aiutare ulteriormente la loro causa.

LEGGI TUTTO

La Banca Centrale della Corea del Sud lancia il programma pilota di valuta digitale
La società di venture capital Grayscale Investments ha registrato un record nel 2019
Lancio della piattaforma di trading petrolifero Blockchain VAKT con Shell e BP come primi utenti
Il famoso CIO Bill Miller investe il 50% degli hedge fund in Bitcoin

The famous decentralized exchange Uniswap has just unveiled its governance token, the UNI. Already listed on Binance and Coinbase Pro, this ERC-20 token trades around $ 4 and all platform users before September 1 can receive 400 UNI.

A cog in decentralized finance (DeFi), Uniswap is now uniquely positioned for community-led growth, development and empowerment

With this in mind, the team decided to introduce Bitcoin Circuit, an ERC20 token allowing users to have a weight for the future of the protocol.

“Uniswap has always adhered to the principles of neutrality and the minimization of trust: it is crucial that governance is limited to areas where it is strictly necessary. With this in mind, the Uniswap governance framework is limited to contributing to the development and use of protocols as well as the development of the larger Uniswap ecosystem, ”says Uniswap.

UNI token holders are therefore invited to participate in the governance proposals for Uniswap. Note that Uniswap team members will not directly participate in governance, although they may delegate votes.

Although the developers don’t mention it, the arrival of the UNI token is a direct response to its SushiSwap clone and SUSHI token. As a war broke out between the two protocols over who would attract the most liquidity, SushiSwap had managed to vampirize more than $ 830 million once locked on Uniswap.

How will UNI be distributed?

According to Uniswap’s blog post , 1 billion UNI tokens have been forged, which will be distributed over a period of 4 years as follows:

60.00% to Uniswap community members
21.51% to team members and future employees with a 4-year restrictive covenant
17.80% to investors with a 4-year restrictive covenant
0.69% to advisors with a 4-year restrictive covenant
Note that from the 5th year, an annual inflation rate of 2% will be applied.

15% of the total supply has already been distributed to former users, ie 150,000,000 UNI . Thus, if you have already used Uniswap (before September 1, 2020), you can collect 400 UNI in the form of an airdrop by going to the platform.

For starters, UNI is available through four liquidity pools, USDT , USDC , wBTC and DAI. Outside of Uniswap, the UNI token is already available on the Binance and Coinbase Pro platform , and is trading at the time of writing for around $ 3.6.

By selling your UNI directly, you can therefore get between several hundred dollars, depending on the price of the UNI token when you sell it. As of this writing, 400 UNI equals $ 1,440.

Armed with its own governance token, Uniswap is now able to resist the invader . SushiSwap, SashimiSwap and all its clones are not as interesting as they used to be. Furthermore, the SUSHI price has suffered since the introduction of the UNI token.

In the days to come, it is quite possible that Uniswap’s liquidity will increase significantly . At the same time, this spectacular craze for the UNI token should probably subside, as should the significant volatility of its price.